In a Talmudic-like manner, Rush seemed to present himself in a way as if he couldn't understand why Sharon should be expected to use restraint instead of revenge against Palestine. The partially conservative, passive and rebellious, Republican advocate, even though amazingly, he admirably has spoken against Affirmative Action, speaks his views as if he were taught propaganda and dupery from his anti-Christian teachers and the insidiously influential media control mechanics. Contrary to his point of view, considering the Palestinians have lost reportedly many more men, women and children than the Israelis have, Sharon's war crimes, and the the illegal occupation of Palestine, it is not a great expectation for Zinni to demand restraint and discourage further wreckage of the peace initiative. (Mar. 29, 02)
The rest of the story:
Protest against the United States' involvement such as military and financial handouts to Israel.
The suicide bombers of Palestine are not Arafat's military confronting Israel under orders; many of these desperately, self-destructive and repercussively revengeful people have opposed their own Palestinian leader. However, Sharon's military men, using the United States' hand-out, high tech, war machinery are under direct orders to destroy others, with the goal of keeping themselves alive. They are stealing and bulldozing for land gain (a crime that has went on passively or neglectfully without international intervention or enforced restriction even such as the threat of the USA taking away the so called "aid" from them) while they call the almost defenseless, resistors (some of them repercussive suicidal martyrs) terrorists. Who is the real terrorist?